COLA Ledger

An independent reference — not affiliated with the Social Security Administration. Every figure traced to the government publication that produced it.

2012 IRMAA brackets — Medicare Part B by income

Where the 2012 adjustment starts

$85,000

A single filer whose 2010 modified adjusted gross income stayed at or below $85,000 paid the standard $99.90. One dollar above it, the premium became $139.90.

Standard premium
$99.90
First threshold, single
$85,001
Highest tier
$319.70+$219.80 adjustment
Income year used
2010two tax years back

The adjustment is a cliff, not a slope. There is no phase-in across a bracket: one dollar of extra income at a threshold moves the whole premium to the next tier, and the step at the first threshold in 2012 was $40.00 a month — $480 over the year for one dollar of income.

2012 Medicare Part B income-related monthly adjustment, by 2010 modified adjusted gross income
SingleMarried filing jointlyAdjustmentTotal Part B
Up to $85,000Up to $170,000none$99.90
$85,001 to $107,000$170,001 to $214,000$40.00$139.90
$107,001 to $160,000$214,001 to $320,000$99.90$199.80
$160,001 to $214,000$320,001 to $428,000$159.80$259.70
$214,001 and above$428,001 and above$219.80$319.70

Checking the table against the statute

The tiers are not arbitrary. The statute sets each one as a share of the total cost of Part B coverage — roughly 35, 50, 65, 80 and 85 percent against the standard 25 percent — so each total should be close to the standard premium multiplied by 1.4, 2.0, 2.6, 3.2, 3.4. Reconstructing the published table that way is how this site checks it independently of the notice it came from.

Reconstruction of the 2012 tiers from the statutory cost-share multipliers
TierPublished totalStandard × multiplierDifference
Tier 1 — ×1.4$139.90$139.86+$0.04
Tier 2 — ×2.0$199.80$199.80+$0.00
Tier 3 — ×2.6$259.70$259.74-$0.04
Tier 4 — ×3.2$319.70$319.68+$0.02

Why the reconstruction never lands exactly, and why that is correct

CMS computes each tier from the unrounded monthly actuarial rate. What gets published is the standard premium already rounded to a dime, so multiplying the rounded figure carries that rounding error up through the multiplier and the tier’s own rounding adds a little more. A build that demanded exact equality here would fail on correct data — and the tempting fix, rounding the reconstruction to the nearest dime, makes it worse, not better. The check this site runs is a per-tier tolerance of 0.05 × the multiplier plus 0.055, with exact equality reserved for the committed table against its own Federal Register source.

Related

Sources and freshness

CMS computes each tier from the unrounded monthly actuarial rate, so exact reconstruction from the rounded standard premium is impossible. SPEC section 3.7 fixes the tolerance at $0.10, which holds for 2026 but is not the right bound generally: the standard premium carries up to $0.05 of rounding error, multiplying it by 3.4 propagates that to $0.17, and the dime rounding of the tier itself adds another $0.05. The bound is therefore per-tier. Never round the reconstruction, and never assert exact equality against it. Exact equality is asserted only between the committed tables and their Federal Register / POMS sources.

Figures effective 1 January 2012. Page figures last verified against the sources above on 10 August 2026. Corrections: the correction log · support@inventum.com.au